The fundamental purpose of this work is to explore, from Law 134 of 1994, the scope of the revocation of the mandate in Colombia, in perspective of three theoretical approaches: liberalism, contractualism and consensualism. To achieve this objective, it is necessary to adopt an exploratory qualitative research methodology, through which it will be possible to understand the revocation of the mandate as a whole and from its most outstanding characteristics. Likewise, it was sought to establish the theoretical foundation of the mechanism, in the perspective of showing the right of resistance that arises from the breaking of the social contract or pact. Finally, reference was made to the right of resistance in the revocation of the mandate of Tasco, Boyacá, and Susa, Cundinamarca.