The theoretycal models about landscape evolution emphasize different aspects: Davis, Penck's and King's models suppose “universality”, “ciclicity” and “determinism” as basic elements; other models conceive “materials” (different lithologies) as explanatory element of geomorphic structures.Climatic and process geomorphology postulate a new paradigm: landscape is view as “resultant” of a relationship network of “forces” or “processes”. Both differs about the meaning of space temporal context of thin king, and spatial patters of produced morphic structures.Recent advances on non-linear dynamic system, applied to the field of geomorphology, demand the need to construct he concept of “morphogenesis” as process system, behavior system and non as agreggate of basic process. In the new approach, the landscape can be visualized as “energetically open and organizationally ebozed “, which means that production of geomorphie structures (landforms) is a intrinsic property of geomorphie systems and non-an attribute of surrounding (climatic of tectonic regimes). On this context, debate about “universality” or “zonality” of morphogenesis and geomorphic structures continues with new elements.