espanolEl objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los argumentos juridicos utilizados por los jueces en el common law y en el derecho civil como tradiciones juridicas cuando tienen que resolver problemas sobre la determinacion de competencia judicial sobre Cyber-Torts. Aqui se analiza la teoria alrededor de jurisdiccion, competencia, Tort, responsabilidad civil extracontractual y Cyber- Torts. Tales conceptos se confrontan con casos resueltos en Colombia, Canada y ee.uu. Para concluir que las reglas tradicionales de procedimiento civil son suficientes para resolver conflictos de jurisdiccion y competencia sobre casos con componentes del Internet. EnglishThe aim of this paper is to analyze the legal reasoning used by judges in common law and civil law legal traditions when they have to solve problems about assertion of jurisdiction over CyberTorts cases. Here I discussed around the theory of jurisdiction, competence, Tort, non contractual liability and Cyber-Torts. These concepts are compared with cases decided in Colombia, Canada and the U.S. To conclude that the traditional rules of civil procedure are sufficient to resolve conflicts of jurisdiction over Interne-based cases.