This research aims to establish the criteria for the application of principles and programs of Therapeutic Jurisprudence (TJ) in cases of alleged child sexual abuse (CSA) in Colombia, taking into account that the statistics in the country reflect that the CSA is a problem currently increasing. Taking this in consideration, a qualitative research was proposed, with a descriptive scope, using the discussion group (DG) technique for data collection. In this way, the work was released with a sample of experts in cases of CSA, which was composed of five professionals (four men and one woman), who were asked about: the present situation of the victims, offenders and all people involved in cases of CSA during the development of a legal process, the effects of the incidents of integral reparation and the application of principles and programs of the Therapeutic Jurisprudence in cases of CSA. Through a content analysis of the DG, the results obtained showed seven categories, which are related to the reality of the Colombian legal system and the complications in the legal processes in cases of CSA. Finally, specific criteria were established for the application of the TJ, where the importance of mental health in the Colombian judicial system was highlighted.