this paper is the result of the research entitled �Political Power and Judicial Subjectivism.� Through this we aim to analyze the properties of autopoietic law with a view to determining what is considered a legal truth within the self-referential macro system, hence the problem we address is the following: What kind of content is given the right under its autopoietic characteristics?To start our analysis is based legal research in a documentary by implementing an exploratory methodology, based on literature sources compiled especially direct source, tools that allowed us to build what will be our argument: The law as historical and linguistic construction for granted their own content through a process of objectifying substantivation, arbitrarily constructed realities that are taken as �legal truth� and are not feasible as this would refute the denial of the claim and the legal chaos that would disable and anthropological social coexistence.