ImpactU Versión 3.11.2 Última actualización: Interfaz de Usuario: 16/10/2025 Base de Datos: 29/08/2025 Hecho en Colombia
Influencia del rotulado frontal en la percepción del aporte nutricional de una bebida procesada con fruta en la comunidad educativa de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Front-of-package labeling systems (FPLS) are tools that help to Increase the understanding and usefulness of the Information available In the packaging, In order to make a rapid assessment of the nutritional contribution of food before buying It, leading to Informed decisions. The objective of this study was therefore, to describe the Influence of three FPLS (Nutritional Descriptors, guideline dally amounts (GDA) and Nutritional Traffic Light rating system) In the perception of the nutritional contribution of a fruit-based processed beverage consumed by the academic community (students, professors and staff) of the Faculty of Sciences of Pontificia Universidad Javerlana. The research Is a cross-sectional descriptive mixed study separated In four phases: 1. Sociodemographic characterization of the population and a qualitative survey of the consumption frequency of fruit-based processed beverages (FBPB), 2. Diagnosis of previous knowledge In nutritional labeling, 3. Design and Implementation of FPLS, and 4. SWOT analysis regarding the applied SRF. Del Valle from The Coca-Cola Company® was Identified as the FBPBs with the highest consumption In the academic community. Participants agreed on reporting the low utility and understanding of nutrition facts label, stressing the education as an essential factor for the use of FPLS. However, FPLS provided a most understandable and usefulness tool for the three groups, being the nutritional traffic light rating system the most reliable. In addition, GDA was more welcomed by the amount of presented Information. It can be concluded that the nutritional traffic light rating system Is the FPLS exhibiting the best potential In relation to the consumption of FBPB. GDA, despite presenting more nutritional Information, generated confusion and low comprehension among the participants, while the nutritional descriptors were qualified as not very showy and lacking Information.