International Criminal Court is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal created under the ideal of generating international justice for heinous crimes of major importance to the international These are genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression. The United States, which was already the hegemon at the time of the creation of the court, was one of the hardest workers in the process of the creation of the ICC. Despite this hard work the United States did not ratify the Rome Statute, and in fact it withdrew the signature. This fact represents a great limitation for the Court's action. Due to the subsidiary nature of the Court, it needs State cooperation in order to act and it is at this point that the United States' non-participation complicates the Court's actions. The position adopted by the United States against the ICC is apparently a logical consequence of an ideological and philosophical position, American Exceptionalism. This consists in considering itself an exceptional nation that should not be governed by the parameters of the other State. The fact that the United States believes that it stands above universal principles or that it s believed of superiority implies an ethical conflict. It is precisely this ethical conflict that concerns this work, which is framed by the question, How ethical is the position of the United States in the face of the International Criminal Court, based on American Exceptionalism? To answer this question this work is structured in three chapters. The first one is a contextualization of the relationship between the United States and the International Criminal Court. The second chapter is the theoretical framework that will be used to analyze the relationship. Finally, the third chapter will deal with the analysis of the United States' position vis-a-vis the Court from an ethical point of view, based on the thesis that this position is unethical because it differs from the framework established by the international community.