The precedent of jurisprudence, is a novel subject in initial lines, its applicability has been gradually, but surely, the tradition in Colombia, has not been peaceful in fully accepting the judicial decisions that emanate from the High Courts for the conformity that You have with the first consultation of the formal law. At present, it is only if a broad and juridical space is being opened to abide by the precedent of the legal experts, the picture is uncertain because it does not unanimously accept the decisions of the High Courts, but this is not practiced in general studies, Is new and as such there is resistance, is also added the constant variation of the normativity and with it generates a deficient, unequal and inconsistent effect that does little applicable jurisprudence. Nonetheless, it is considered that not every judicial decision is mandatory, it is intended to specify the obligation to abide by precedent jurisprudence, although the ordinary jurisprudence defines processes do not have the scope of what is currently constituted in precedent, as stated in This work is therefore mandatory in terms of judicial decisions and is not binding, but complementary arguments.