The most outstanding innovation in constitutional law after the Second World War is the aptitude of the pronouncements of the constitutional courts for developing a positive regulatory role through the issuance of various forms of atypical rulings. They are intended to provide realistic and flexible responses to unconstitutional situations which in turn may have resulted from the very exercise of its role of guardian of the integrity and supremacy of the Constitution, its duty to determine the meaning and scope of values and constitutional principles, its effort to develop the principle of conservation of legislative standards, and the need to avoid the regulatory gaps produced not only by its judgements, but most particularly by its thrust to guarantee the constitutional rights.