The terrible thing that has taken on the appearance of what a human being does to another, says Myriam Revault (2010) is, in essence, a political question may be, from now on, the political question par excellence (p. 17). The slaughter and brutality are some of the most striking ways in which the horror is introduced to the world and are presented as a phenomenal stage of human capacity for cruelty. In Colombia, between 1980 and 2012 1,982 588 episodes of massacres and brutality were recorded, with paramilitary groups responsible for over 60% of these cases (GMH, 2013). In this scenario emerges from political-ethical characteristics of subjectivity capable of exercising cruelty and configures the device as part of the Colombian paramilitaries question. For addressing this question to a phenomenological and hermeneutical perspective (Ricoeur, 2010) focused on the analysis of narratives that allow tracing, uncover and understand the characteristics of this form of subjectivity and footprints device paramilitary subjectivity involved in your one resorts configuration. This type of micro-political and psychosocial dynamics of armed conflict, both approaches represent a contribution to the restoration of the rights of the victims to truth, reparation and guarantees of non-repetition, as scenarios and efforts to reintegrate and the construction of new social fabric based on mutual recognition.