the judgment, as linguistic expression is rich conceptual from which set out various mental processes in which the subject takes positions critically, this for each context makes evident perspectives assumed in proportion to the process for which will be applied , in this respect, this paper sets out two processes , philosophical judgment as a reflective element that allows the subject to position - taking in relation to a specific idea and judgment of quality, where in order to achieve continuous improvement of the processes analyzed , is performed reflections conducting weigh and evaluate actions to establish improvement plans, which , in the context of quality processes National Accreditation Council ( CNA ), in processes institutional accreditation self-assessment, jointly intervene as a means, in both their interaction is to identify, define and delimit the conditions of the institution and from this analysis generate improvement plans for its consolidation, and as an end in itself, regarding the culmination of a process as evaluative figure for determining the levels of satisfaction and compliance with the indicators of the ANC, then being self-evaluation processes convergence scenario practiced for both trials