This research is an analysis of the implementation and development that has taken the various statements of ECI in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Colombia, in particular the case of forced displacement of the indigenous reservations Nulpe Medium and Large Chad indigenous community study Awa in Narino Department, within the period 2012-213 in the context of overcoming the ECI declared by judgment T-025 of 2004, based on the foregoing born this work which is organized into three parts, in Section one provides a general context of the legal institution of ECI fundamentals, justification and above all the necessary criteria are analyzed to establish the existence and improvement of this figure. In part two situations in particular where an analysis of the various pronouncements that our highest constitutional authority has issued in this part one is addressed to the circumstances that have merited the declaration of ECI and exceptional situations is done is try that Although there all circumstances for declaratory judgment of the court does not merited its establishment. Finally, the incidence of ECI in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and the level of compliance with the orders issued by the court in order to overcome the ECI declared in the T-025, 2004 (Case Awa) was established. In conclusion, the results showed us the research was that although the emergence of this institution was one of the most important, original and useful innovations of contemporary constitutionalism to national and international jurisprudence as a means of visualization and conceptualization of scenarios flagrant massive and serious human rights violations, also became visible some gaps and inconsistency that the same constitutional court falls in their pronouncements, just as it was established a low level of compliance with the orders issued by the court in the process of ECI declared in the T-025, 2004 (Case Awa)