La Corte Suprema de Justicia, en diferentes sentencias de tutela, ha venido interpretando en forma exegetica el articulo 230, lo que ha producido una hermeneutica sesgada de dicho precepto. En varias providencias de tutela, la Corte Suprema ha negado la procedencia de la accion tutela contra sus providencias de cierre, con base en una comprension clasica del derecho. The Colombian Supreme Court‘s opinions have interpreted section 230 of the Constitution formalistically, and this has led to a biased construal of that provision. In several opinions, the Supreme Court has dismissed writs of protection of fundamental rights filed against its own opinions, and it has done so based on an antiquated understanding of law.