ImpactU Versión 3.11.2 Última actualización: Interfaz de Usuario: 16/10/2025 Base de Datos: 29/08/2025 Hecho en Colombia
Inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) regimens in patients with obesity: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract Background Obesity is a global epidemic, projected to affect 4 billion people by 2035. Anesthesia regimens, including volatile anesthetics and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), impact postoperative outcomes, particularly in obese patients who face increased risks of complications. Volatile anesthetics are often associated with higher rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), while TIVA may improve recovery but can increase costs and present additional challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effects of these anesthesia methods on perioperative outcomes, including hemodynamic stability, recovery, and PONV, in this high-risk population. Methods Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024547776) studies were identified through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CINDAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted. Results Thirteen studies with 1072 participants were included. Inhalational anesthesia significantly increases PONV (RR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.21–3.60; p = 0.01; I 2 = 34%) and intraoperative heart rate (MD, 3.49; 95% CI, 0.01–6.97; p < 0.01; I 2 = 67.6%) compared to TIVA. Other outcomes, including mean arterial pressure, duration of intensive care unit stay, recovery time, opioid use, and pain, showed no significant differences between TIVA and inhalational anesthesia in the present analysis. Conclusion TIVA appears to improve perioperative outcomes in obese patients by reducing PONV and intraoperative heart rate, highlighting its potential advantages in clinical practice. Further research is needed to address variability and establish evidence-based guidelines for anesthesia management in this high-risk population. Systematic review registration Number in PROSPERO CRD42024547776
Tópico:
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Citaciones:
0
Citaciones por año:
No hay datos de citaciones disponibles
Altmétricas:
0
Información de la Fuente:
FuenteJournal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical Care