Intermittent schedules of reinforcement are frequently used in dog training. During fixed-time schedules (FT), reinforcement delivery is time-based and response-independent. In contrast, during fixed-interval schedules (FI), a response produces a reinforcer if a certain amount of time has elapsed since the last reinforcer was delivered (i.e., FI schedules are time-based and response-dependent). FT schedules are typically used in noncontingent-reinforcement interventions with the aim of decreasing an undesired behavior. While the effectiveness of these interventions has been reliably shown with human and non-human animal learners, little is known about the emotional behavior that is related to these contingencies. In the present study, the target behavior (stepping on a mat) of six dogs was initially trained (shaped) and maintained on a FI 15s schedule. In addition, dogs were exposed to a FT 15s schedule, a combination of FT 15s and FI 15s schedules, and an extinction-only condition (no reinforcement was delivered for the target response). We found that rates of emotional responses (e.g., lip/nose licking, vocalizing) varied in prevalence across dogs and phases. Although lip/nose licking was displayed in high rates across all dogs and phases, it was generally lower in baseline and extinction phases. This suggests that these phases produced less frustration-related behavior. The effect size calculations for dogs engaging in pacing, sneezing, and vocalizing, underscored the varied prevalence of the behaviors across phases and dogs, and yielded mostly small- to medium-size effects. These results are especially relevant for the training of companion and working dogs and their well-being during training sessions. Future research should continue investigating emotional behavior in dogs across various schedules of reinforcement (e.g., variable schedules).