Abstract The study aimed to determine the dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity of the Sexual Orientation Experiences of Discrimination (SOEOD-9) among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people in Santa Marta, Colombia. The study included 303 individuals between 18 and 70 years old. Participants completed the SOEOD-9. Dimensionality was explored using confirmatory (CFA) factor analysis; internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega; and nomological validity with Student’s test. The SOEOD-9 presented two factors that explained 51.6% of the variance and high internal consistency. Nevertheless, the CFA showed poor indicators of goodness-of-fit for the two-dimensional solution. A five-item version (SOEOD-5) improved overall performance (dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity). In conclusion, the SOEOD-9 shows a two-factor internal structure with poor goodness-of-fit indicators and acceptable internal consistency and nomological validity. The SOEOD-5 presents better global indicators of dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity.