The UAC (Universal allocation per child), within its design and structure, constitutes anequalizing mechanism of possibilities, as it not only guarantees the stipend of money forvulnerable sectors by trying to break the cycle of poverty transmission, but seeks to improvethe quality of life for the beneficiaries in health, with the corresponding sanitary controls,and education. However, when UAC is taken to a context of confinement, gaps are denoted inthe design and administrative discretion of grant and instrumentalization, which impede theeffective access of the recipients to the program in some regions or limit the effects intended by itin other subnational regions where the beneficiary subjects may enjoy access. That is why in thisqualitative design work with a collection of jurisdictional, doctrinal, normative and empiricalinformation, through participant observation and semi-structured interviews, which intendsto answer the following questions: What are the main issues which this context poses for theprogram? Should a differential regime be qualified for this scenario?