During the last decade, Neoliberalism has been claimed to be an ideological hinge –as the promise that enabled the passage from Fordism to Post-Fordism, from disciplinary societies to security/control societies. Consequently, like every other passage, it was rushed from its enunciation to its anachronism as a worn connecting fragment. In the rise of crisis some theorist argued that Neoliberalism ―has been discredited‖, ―has lost relevance‖, ―is in trouble, if not definitively dead‖. However, when discussing about neoliberal capitalism, we imply at least two things: an ideology and a mode of governance. In this article we aim to study how these elements were distinctly affected in the announcement of such passage, which, after the last economic crisis, has become more of a metamorphosis.