There are scant academic or research studies about the issue of workplace harassment in Colombia. It originated as a change response to the international community who believed the Colombian government violated human and labor rights. Studies conducted demonstrate that the progress achieved with the Workplace Harassment Law 1010 of 2016 revolves around two dimensions of knowledge, namely, health and law. This shows a slow progress in coherence and enforceability and reconsiders the importance of acknowledging other aspects. Under this law, the interpretation of harassment is built upon a denotation of interpersonal actions where the responsibility falls on the individuals involved, not on the organizational structures that should be based on the conception of generating good labor practices. The lack of participation of the State, business owners, and workers in the establishment of regulations create a situation of power imbalance in the field of work relations and strategies proposed. The hermeneutic method of interpretation and documentary review in stages was used for conducting a reflection on Law 1010 of 2006. It is concluded that the Workplace Harassment Law is the result of a one-way debate lacking the engagement of organizations or entities that are affected by violence in the workplace.