The present text responds to the question, What criteria and concepts should we, we wouldlike, and above all, we could be able to explain, understand and transform in order to design,and above all, to execute a decent housing based public policy effectively and efficiently Incriteria of social responsibility? When it tries to do so, it leaves open other questions, such as:In addition to the well - known Vitruvian triadic, firmitas - utilitas - venustas, applicable to collective community facilities, what would be the contemporary basis for “other” manifestations orarchitectural creations, such as Housing, public space and even the landscape as a culturalproduct of distinction? The author assumes a socio-critical epistemological stance, based on aholistic research methodology; Its main findings are to discover the architectural delusion of formby form and how to use diatopic hermeneutics as an antidote to it. Therefore, its conclusionsare presented as non-agreements, as a starting point between several authors, the author andthe reader and their relevance is based on the possibility of restoring resilience and dignity asthe new criteria to define sustainability, Both in the form and behavior of human beings, and ofcourse, in their “dignified” housing in a context of social responsibility.