The purpose of this article is achieved, as far as displays from research for peace and the Law, the world of Transitional Justice and its institutions and the impact of this restorative model punishable traditionally investigates and judges the to counteract criminal rules in the way in building and achieving the supreme value of peace, important issue which is of difficulty and complexity when it explicit in ordinary criminal cases, and especially to the victims whose significance of this change temporary, you might see an opportunity to impunity more. This is evidenced by the intense debate in academia, intellectuals, violentologists, irenólogos, in the bar of the Colombian Constitutional Justice. And the proof is one of those legal procedures that have been intervened by the rules of transition, where the balance is put into force the legal assurance of legality, on one side, facing the truth, justice, repair, the commitment not to repeat if it is to achieve peace. It is a staging of tensions between the two institutions, to those who defend each side not facing different arguments, polarization does not give scope for a joint position. In any case, it is an exercise in verifobia agreed for peaceful purposes.
