The analysis of territorial reorganization in worldwide scale becomes increasingly more complex considering the rising fragmentation of the spatial phenomena caused by various human relations.Considering the various social structures, highliting here the State, and its political-economic relationships with other structures of equivalent level.The comprehension of geostrategic concept "new order" in the largest scale possible, therefore, can be designed and processed from two main hypothesis: a) the construction of geographical space is chaotic and none nexus of causality can be established by geographic method; or b) there is a systematizable logic, even if it is not so clear initially, but what permits to achieve coherent answers, but not a little surprising about expectations around the problem.Starting from the second premise, we can realize that it is possible to establish a link between the geopolitical phenomena occurring on a regional scale, especially after the Second World War, and the construction of the own term "new world order", as well as their implications to the category "territory" following the methodological steps of Jean Gottmann.Finally, the proposal brought by this text aims to encourage reconsiderations about of the possible applicability of the term "new world order" and identify to what levels of arranger power of territories that adjectivation could serve for.