This paper develops a theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between violent contexts and vote choice by drawing on insights from literature on the contextual determinants of political behavior and civil wars. It tests the hypothesis that individuals living in a violent context tend to behave in line with the strategic objectives and ideological orientations proclaimed by the armed actor dominating the area. Using a national survey conducted in Colombia in 2005, and contextual level data, this paper employs hierarchical regression models to test this hypothesis. Results suggest a significant relationship between violent contexts and vote choices. On moving from areas dominated by left-wing insurgents to regions controlled by right-wing paramilitary groups, individuals were more likely to support a presidential candidate on the right of the ideological spectrum. However, this relationship appears to be conditioned by partisanship as minority party sympathizers’ vote choices are the most affected by changes in violent contexts.