The Penman-Monteith model (PM) is a useful "one-step" method for evapotranspiration (ET) estimation, if surface resistance (rs-ms–1) estimates can be derived. This study has as its objective to evaluate different methods of rs estimation and the accuracy of the resulting ET estimates in common bean (P. vulgaris L.). The experiment was conducted at the Fortuna Agricultural Experiment Station at Juana Diaz, PR. Four automated weather stations were placed in plots planted with two genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Net radiation, soil heat flux, soil temperature, soil moisture, air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and direction were recorded at ten second intervals. Each weather station had an elevator system that moved the air temperature and relative humidity sensor between two vertical positions over the crop canopy every two minutes during a complete day. The rs was derived by stomatal resistance (rL) and leaf area index (LAI) measurements (PM-1), and by direct micrometeorological variables as follows: inverse of the general PM-model (PM-2), as a function of the soil moisture (PM-3), and as a latent heat flux-λE (PM-4 and ET-Station). The results indicate that PM-1 under-estimated rs at low LAI, and that rs and rL are influenced inversely by the aerodynamic resistance (ra), which affected the precision of the PM-2 and ET station estimation especially under windy and dry conditions, but not the PM-3 and PM-4 methods.