The article aims to expose the right to proof in the jurisprudence of Colombian Constitutional Court; its presents a doctrinal construction from the fundamental rights, specifically the right to proof. The analysis method used was the documentary and jurisprudential review. The text is derived from an investigation in which the general objective is to analyze the constitutional right to judicial proof in relation to its foundations, its configuration and its constitutional limits, in the jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court and the legal and constitutional theory. The specific objectives are: first, to inquire about the nature of a fundamental right to judicial proof in the Colombian constitutional regime; second, to confront the configuration of the right to prove in terms of the evidentiary phase; and finally, to examine the constitutional and legal limits of the right to proof.