Logotipo ImpactU
Autor

Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review

Acceso Cerrado
ID Minciencias: ART-0000147451-25
Ranking: ART-ART_A1

Abstract:

Predictive theory on how plant diversity promotes herbivore suppression through movement patterns, host associations, and predation promises a potential alternative to pesticide-intensive monoculture crop production. We used meta-analysis on 552 experiments in 45 articles published over the last 10 years to test if plant diversification schemes reduce herbivores and/or increase the natural enemies of herbivores as predicted by associational resistance hypotheses, the enemies hypothesis, and attraction and repellency model applications in agriculture. We found extensive support for these models with intercropping schemes, inclusion of flowering plants, and use of plants that repel herbivores or attract them away from the crop. Overall, herbivore suppression, enemy enhancement, and crop damage suppression effects were significantly stronger on diversified crops than on crops with none or fewer associated plant species. However, a relatively small, but significantly negative, mean effect size for crop yield indicated that pest-suppressive diversification schemes interfered with production, in part because of reducing densities of the main crop by replacing it with intercrops or non-crop plants. This first use of meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of diversification schemes, a potentially more powerful tool than tallies of significant positive and negative outcomes (vote-counting), revealed stronger overall effects on all parameters measured compared to previous reviews. Our analysis of the same articles used in a recent review facilitates comparisons of vote-counting and meta-analysis, and shows that pronounced results of the meta-analysis are not well explained by a reduction in articles that met its stricter criteria. Rather, compared to outcome counts, effect sizes were rarely neutral (equal to zero), and a mean effect size value for mixed outcomes could be calculated. Problematic statistical properties of vote-counting were avoided with meta-analysis, thus providing a more precise test of the hypotheses. The unambiguous and encouraging results from this meta-analysis of previous research should motivate ecologists to conduct more mechanistic experiments to improve the odds of designing effective crop diversification schemes for improved pest regulation and enhanced crop yield.

Tópico:

Plant Parasitism and Resistance

Citaciones:

Citations: 759
759

Citaciones por año:

Altmétricas:

Paperbuzz Score: 0
0

Información de la Fuente:

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
FuenteEcological Applications
Cuartil año de publicaciónNo disponible
Volumen21
Issue1
Páginas9 - 21
pISSNNo disponible
ISSN1051-0761

Enlaces e Identificadores:

Scienti ID0001211064-4Scienti ID0000147451-25Scienti ID0000346314-22
Scienti ID0000971642-17Scienti ID0000352489-6Scienti ID0001412169-2
Scienti ID0000506591-50Scienti ID0000838500-161Minciencias IDART-0000147451-25
Scienti ID0000237540-26Scienti ID0001111906-27Scienti ID0000894869-6
Scienti ID0000771589-16Scholar citations URLhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=16581545419546760044&as_sdt=5,33&sciodt=0,33&hl=enPmid URLhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21516884
Scienti URLhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/09-2026.1/fullPdf URLhttps://www.academia.edu/download/43842482/Does_plant_diversity_benefit_agroecosyst20160317-31777-1bjvpm1.pdfOpenalex URLhttps://openalex.org/W2053997328
Doi URLhttps://doi.org/10.1890/09-2026.1Scholar URLhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=info%3AbBMXz7R7HeYJ%3Ascholar.google.com&btnG=
Artículo de revista