La jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos ha tenido un impacto trascendental en la forma como el Consejo de Estado de Colombia viene reparando a victimas de graves violaciones de derechos humanos, desde hace algunos anos. Asi, se ha pasado de una mera indemnizacion pecuniaria a una verdadera indemnizacion integral, siguiendo para tales efectos los lineamientos que ha dado la Corte Interamericana en sus pronunciamientos. Para ello, el maximo Tribunal Administrativo ha aplicado el denominado control de convencionalidad y ha incorporado dentro de su jurisprudencia medidas de justicia restaurativa conforme al principio de restitutio in integrum y de reparacion integral, llegando inclusive a abordar el tema de la reparacion transformadora. Palabras clave: Control de convencionalidad, reparacion, victimas, Colombia, Consejo de Estado y Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Abstract: Since few years ago, the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has had a transcendental impact in the form how the Colombian Council of State is repairing the victims in serious violations of human rights. Thus, it has passed from a mere pecuniary compensation to a real integral compensation following for such effects the guidelines given by the Interamerican Court in its pronouncements. In order to achieve that, the maximum Administrative Court has applied the called conventionality control and has incorporated inside his jurisprudence measures of restorative justice in conformity with the beginning of restitution in integrum and of integral repair, managing to approach including the topic of the transformative repair. Keywords: Conventionality control, reparation, victims, Colombia, Council of State, Inter-American Court of Human Rights.