El problema de la locura siempre ha rondado y cuestionado el estatus de la psicologia; le ha preguntado sobre su autenticidad y capacidad de respuesta hacia ella. En su corta historia, la psicologia le ha respondido, —sin que se tenga certeza—, si de la forma adecuada y esperada ante la expectativa del loco. En esta ocasion se reflexiona sobre la posibilidad que tendria la psicologia, desde el psicoanalisis, para responder a la intervencion en la locura, en momentos actuales donde la globalizacion, las reglas del mercado neoliberal y la terapia centrada en la evidencia, ademas de los avances en la bio-medica molecular, son los principales referentes para la valorizacion de la acciones hacia la salud mental. Hay toda una posibilidad de repensar el trato con el loco desde el psicoanalisis en extension, pero esta pasa por cuestionar hitos arraigados en la psicologia y otros mas que refieren a los criterios de concepcion, gestion e impacto en torno a la salud y el sujeto. Abstract The problem of madness always has made the rounds and questioned estatus of psychology; the madness has asked on its authenticity and capacity to answer towards it. In its short history, the psychology has responded to it, - without which certainty- , if it had had of the suitable and waited for the expectation of the crazy person. In this occasion it is reflected on the possibility that would have psychology, from the psychoanalysis, to respond to the intervention in madness, at present moments where the globalizacion, the rules of the neoliberal market and the therapy centered in the evidence, in addition with the advances in the molecular biomedical therapy, are the main referring ones for the valuation of the actions towards the mental health. There is all a possibility of rethink the deal with the crazy person from the psychoanalysis in extension, but it happens to question landmarks rooted in psychology and others more than refer the criteria of conception, management and impact around the health and the subject.