Logotipo ImpactU
Autor

Evaluation of two strategies for debriefing simulation in the development of skills for neonatal resuscitation: a randomized clinical trial

Acceso Abierto
ID Minciencias: ART-0000685852-88
Ranking: ART-ART_A2

Abstract:

Abstract Objective To evaluate two debriefing strategies for the development of neonatal resuscitation skills in health professionals responsible for the critical newborn care in a high-complexity university Hospital. Results A simple blind randomized clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-four professionals (pediatricians, nurses, and respiratory therapists) were randomly assigned for two interventions; one group received oral debriefing and the other oral debriefing assisted by video. Three standardized clinical scenarios that were recorded on video were executed. A checklist was applied for the evaluation, administered by a reviewer blinded to the assignment of the type of debriefing . The two debriefing strategies increased the technical and behavioral neonatal resuscitation skills of the participants, without one being superior to the other. The coefficient of the difference in the compliance percentage between the two types of debriefing was − 3.6% (95% CI − 13.77% to 6.47%). When comparing the development of technical and behavioral skills among the professionals evaluated, no significant differences were found between the types of debriefing . The two debriefing strategies increase compliance percentages, reaching or approaching 100%. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03606278. July 30, 2018. Retrospectively registered

Tópico:

Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare

Citaciones:

Citations: 28
28

Citaciones por año:

Altmétricas:

Paperbuzz Score: 0
0

Información de la Fuente:

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
FuenteBMC Research Notes
Cuartil año de publicaciónNo disponible
Volumen11
Issue1
Páginas1 - 5
pISSNNo disponible
ISSNNo disponible

Enlaces e Identificadores:

Artículo de revista